Dashboard
← All articles

July 21, 2026 · Kaaname Digital · 5 min read

90 Leads at $24 Per Lead: A Facebook Ads Case Study for a Power Washing Company

A residential power washing company in Virginia generated 90 leads at a $24.22 cost per lead using Facebook Ads, including a 1,140% jump in leads from month one to month two.

Facebook Ads work differently from Google Ads in one fundamental way: you are reaching people before they search, not while they search. For home services businesses with a defined local market and a repeatable service, that distinction matters. This case study shows what a well-structured Facebook campaign can produce for a local residential services company, including what one month of serious optimization did to the lead volume.


The client

A residential power washing company serving homeowners in Falmouth, Stafford, and Fredericksburg, Virginia. Known for high-quality service, they had a strong reputation locally but needed a more consistent, scalable way to generate new customer inquiries.


The problem

The core challenge was building a qualified audience of local homeowners who could become long-term, repeat customers. Power washing is a service most homeowners need regularly, which makes each new lead worth more than just one job. The client wanted leads that could eventually be retargeted and used to build lookalike audiences for future campaigns.


The goal

Generate leads from homeowners interested in power washing services within a defined geographic area, with a focus on attracting customers who could become a sustainable long-term client base.


The strategy

The campaign ran for three months on Facebook and Instagram, with results tracked through month four. Budget was set at $1,300 per month.

Audience research was the starting point. The team identified homeowners in the specific Virginia communities the client served and built targeting around that profile. From there, multiple targeting and creative combinations were tested to find what actually moved people to submit a lead.

Remarketing and lookalike audiences were introduced to amplify what was working. Remarketing kept the brand visible to people who had already shown interest. Lookalike audiences expanded reach to new homeowners who matched the profile of existing leads, a cost-efficient way to scale without starting from scratch on targeting.

The most significant strategic shift came from A/B testing the ad creative. The test showed that dynamic static image ads consistently outperformed regular static ads. Once that was established, the campaign leaned heavily into the winning format. Dynamic static ads allow for variation within a defined visual framework, keeping the creative fresh without requiring entirely new assets for every iteration.

The best-performing ads used clear, free-offer CTAs. "Get Free Estimate" and "Get Quote" worked because they removed the perceived risk of making contact. For a homeowner who is interested but not yet committed, a free estimate is a low-stakes first step.


The results

Over three months tracked through month four, on a $1,300 per month budget:

  • Month 1: 5 leads at a cost per lead of $40.01
  • Month 2: 57 leads at a cost per lead of $21.23
  • Total leads by end of campaign: 90
  • Final cost per lead: $24.22

The jump from 5 leads in month one to 57 leads in month two represents a 1,140% increase in a single month. That number reflects what happens when a campaign moves from the testing phase into an optimized configuration that has found its audience.


What drove the performance

The month two breakthrough. Month one produced 5 leads. That result alone would look unimpressive in isolation. But it generated the data needed to understand what targeting and creative combinations were working. Month two's 57 leads came from applying those learnings at full speed. This is the pattern Facebook campaigns follow when they are managed properly: a slower, data-heavy first phase followed by a significant performance jump once the winning variables are identified.

Dynamic static creative. The A/B test finding here is worth paying attention to. Regular static ads are fixed. Dynamic static ads allow the platform to serve slight variations in image, copy, or format to different audience segments, then automatically favor the combinations that perform best. For a home services business running a local campaign, this creative format consistently outperforms a single static image because it gives the algorithm something to optimize against.

Lookalike audiences built on real leads. Once the campaign had generated a meaningful set of qualified leads, those leads became the seed for a lookalike audience targeting new homeowners with a similar profile. This is one of the most efficient scaling methods available in Meta advertising. Rather than guessing at who might be interested, you're telling the platform to find more people who look like the ones who already converted.

Free estimate positioning. The offer framing made the first step easy. A homeowner who sees a "Get Free Estimate" ad does not have to commit to anything. That low-friction entry point consistently produces more leads than ads that ask for direct booking or immediate contact without offering something in return.

Geographic precision. Running the campaign within a tight geographic radius kept budget focused on homeowners the client could actually serve. Broader geographic targeting might have produced more impressions but worse lead quality. In home services, proximity is a qualification filter.


Facebook Ads vs. Google Ads for home services

Both channels work for home services businesses, but they work differently and serve different moments in the customer journey.

Google Ads captures people who are already searching for a service. They have a defined need and they are actively looking for a provider. The intent is high but the audience is smaller at any given moment.

Facebook Ads reaches a broader audience before the search happens. The targeting is interest and behavior based rather than intent based, which means you are introducing your business to people who fit the profile of a potential customer, even if they haven't started looking yet.

For power washing specifically, most homeowners don't search for the service unprompted. They notice their driveway looks dirty, they see a neighbor's freshly cleaned exterior, or they see an ad that puts the idea in their head. Facebook is well positioned to create that trigger. The free estimate offer then converts that initial interest into a lead before the prospect ever does a Google search.

The two channels also work well together. A homeowner who sees a Facebook ad and doesn't convert can later be retargeted with a Google search ad when they eventually do search. Running both channels simultaneously creates multiple touchpoints in the same customer journey.


What this looks like for GTA home services businesses

Power washing, window cleaning, eavestrough cleaning, and similar exterior home services businesses in the Greater Toronto Area have a strong seasonal demand cycle. The late spring and early summer window is when homeowners are most receptive to this category of service, which makes the timing of a Facebook campaign as important as the targeting.

A well-structured Meta Ads campaign started in early spring can build an audience and optimize through peak demand, producing qualified leads at a sustainable cost for the season. The lookalike audiences built from those leads then form the foundation for the following year's campaign.

At Kaaname Digital, Meta Ads management is part of our Growth and Full Service plans. If you want to talk through what a Facebook campaign could produce for your home services business this season, book a free consultation. We'll look at your market and tell you what's realistic.